Each case lists the documents involved, what the agent does with them, the output you get back and how it is metered. Cases describe designed behaviour; the product is in early access.
A's invoice to SG Holdings was posted by the group AP team against HK Trading; SG shows nothing, HK shows a payable it does not owe.
B's AP posted INV-20931 on receipt of the PDF and again when the paper copy arrived. B shows double the payable.
A payment for services was posted by B to the intercompany loan account instead of trade payables; the trade balance looks unpaid and the lo…
B pays 18,250 but A receives 18,200; B's bank charged 50 and netted it. A shows 50 outstanding.
B pays 2% less, citing the discount clause; A never issued a credit note and still shows the 2% outstanding.
A cross-border service fee is paid net of 10% withholding; the payer has the tax certificate, the recipient still shows the gross receivable…
The decision to waive a 1,200 late fee exists only in a six-message email thread; neither ledger reflects it.
A scanned invoice carries a handwritten correction of the amount; the ledger used the printed figure.
Each entity exports its intercompany ledger from a different system: column names, date formats and sign conventions all differ.
Forty recharges of a few hundred dollars each are translated line by line; the sum differs from the other side's single translated total by …
A invoices in USD; B's books are in EUR. A translates at the booking-date rate, B at the payment-date rate. The balances differ by a few hun…
A invoices in USD, B pays in HKD from a HKD account; the bank converts. A receives slightly less USD than invoiced.
The PBC list asks for the invoices behind a 9,900 intercompany balance; the entity controller left and the files are in a shared drive with …
An email thread agrees a 3,600 credit; A issued CN-00412 but B never posted it and still shows the full payable.
A booked INV-7781 to B; B has no record of receiving it. The item sits open for two months.
The auditor requires signed intercompany confirmations for 11 counterparties; last year it took the team two weeks of emails.
After all entity pairs are reconciled, the consolidation elimination still shows a residual of 1,840.
Last quarter's reconciliation explained 14 items with draft entries; six were never posted and reappear this quarter.
A recharge for seconded staff includes a bonus the agreement does not cover; the receiving entity disputes it by email.
After entity B merged into entity C, A kept invoicing B; C's ledger shows nothing, B's dormant ledger shows payables.
Head office allocates IT cost by headcount; the subsidiary expected revenue-based allocation per the agreement.
A ships on 28 September; B receives on 2 October. A has recognised revenue and a receivable; B has neither inventory nor a payable.
Entity A invoices Entity B on 29 September; B's AP team posts it on 3 October. At September close A shows a receivable B does not show as a …
The parent accrues a quarterly management fee monthly; the subsidiary books it only when the invoice arrives in the third month.
The lender accrues on actual/360; the borrower on actual/365. The quarterly interest differs by a predictable amount.
A 100,000 repayment is applied first to accrued interest by the lender and entirely to principal by the borrower.
The group netting centre pays each entity one net amount; entity ledgers still show 40 gross balances to clear.
A's bank shows a 27,310.50 credit from B with reference 'PAYMENT'. Three open invoices could match.
We are onboarding a small number of design partners with real documents and real deadlines. Tell us what you work on and we will set up a workspace with your material.